Blockchain technology has emerged as a groundbreaking innovation, transforming how we perceive data management and security in the digital age. Its decentralized nature, cryptographic security, and transparent ledger system offer a stark contrast to traditional centralized systems, promising enhanced efficiency, trust, and immutability. This article delves into the fundamentals of blockchain, exploring its architecture, applications, challenges, and future prospects, providing a comprehensive understanding of this revolutionary technology.

The Genesis of Digital Ledgers

The concept of a ledger, a record of transactions, has been central to commerce for centuries [1]. Traditional ledgers, however, are centralized, relying on a trusted authority for validation and maintenance. This introduces vulnerabilities such as manipulation, corruption, and human error [2]. Accounting scandals stemming from manipulated centralized ledgers highlight these risks [3]. Access restrictions further limit transparency, creating bottlenecks and inefficiencies.

The digitization of ledgers through computers improved efficiency but largely retained the centralized structure, inheriting the same vulnerabilities [4]. While data processing became faster, the core issues of trust and security remained unresolved [5]. Early attempts to create digital currencies struggled due to the lack of a central authority to prevent double-spending and ensure security [6]. These failures underscored the need for a robust, decentralized solution.

A watershed moment arrived in 2008 with Bitcoin, introducing the blockchain – a decentralized digital ledger [7]. Conceived by Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin ingeniously combined cryptography, a peer-to-peer network, and a consensus mechanism to establish trust and immutability without a central authority [8]. This innovation enabled direct peer-to-peer transactions, reducing censorship and manipulation risks [9]. The blockchain represented a fundamental shift in data management, providing a secure, transparent, and immutable record, paving the way for numerous innovations beyond cryptocurrencies [10].

Demystifying Blockchain Technology

At its core, a blockchain is a continuously growing digital ledger secured by cryptography [11]. It's a shared and immutable record of transactions distributed across a network of computers, enhancing resilience against failure or attack [12]. The basic unit is the 'block,' and these chronologically linked, cryptographically secured blocks form the 'chain' [13]. Each block contains a timestamp, transaction data, and a cryptographic hash of the previous block, creating an interconnected structure [14].

This interconnected structure makes blockchain tamper-proof [15]. Altering a block's data changes its hash, invalidating subsequent blocks' hashes [16]. Manipulating the blockchain requires recalculating hashes across the entire network, a computationally infeasible task, especially as the blockchain grows [17]. This resistance to tampering makes blockchain attractive for applications requiring high trust and data integrity [18].

Blockchain technology has the potential to eliminate intermediaries in transactions [19]. Traditionally, trusted third parties verify and facilitate exchanges, adding costs and complexities [20]. Blockchain enables peer-to-peer transfers, reducing these costs and delays [21]. For example, international money transfers can be streamlined with blockchain-based cryptocurrencies, significantly reducing both cost and transfer time [22]. This disintermediation can revolutionize finance, supply chain management, voting, and digital identity [23].

Different types of blockchains exist, each designed for specific purposes [24]. Public blockchains, like Bitcoin and Ethereum, are permissionless, allowing anyone to participate [25]. Private blockchains are permissioned, restricting access to authorized participants, often used by businesses for internal data management [26]. Consortium blockchains are jointly managed by a group of organizations, suitable for collaborative projects [27].

The integrity of a blockchain relies on its consensus mechanism [28]. Proof-of-Work (PoW), used by Bitcoin, requires participants (miners) to solve complex puzzles to validate transactions [29]. Proof-of-Stake (PoS), used by Ethereum (after the Merge), selects validators based on their cryptocurrency holdings [30]. The choice of consensus mechanism impacts security, scalability, and environmental impact [31].

Smart contracts add automation to blockchain technology [32]. These self-executing contracts, stored on the blockchain, automatically enforce agreements when predefined conditions are met [33]. For example, a smart contract could release funds when a shipment arrives [34]. Smart contracts streamline processes, reduce fraud risk, and increase transparency, enabling decentralized applications (dApps) [35]. Bolstered by smart contracts, blockchain is constructing a new paradigm for trust and efficiency [36].

Behind the Blockchain: Understanding the Technology That Powers Digital Ledgers

At the heart of blockchain's potential lies its decentralized architecture [37]. Unlike centralized systems, blockchain distributes control and data across a network of nodes [38]. In contrast to a traditional bank with a central database, a decentralized blockchain operates without a single point of control, with every node holding a copy of the ledger [39].

This distributed nature enhances security and resilience [40]. While an attack on a central server can compromise a centralized system, a decentralized blockchain has no single point of failure [41]. Manipulating the blockchain requires controlling a significant portion of the network's nodes, making it incredibly difficult [42]. This robustness makes blockchain attractive for applications where security is paramount [43]. If a hacker attempts to alter a transaction, other nodes would reject the inconsistent change [44].

The absence of a central authority fosters transparency and accountability [45]. All transactions are recorded on a publicly verifiable ledger [46]. While identities may be masked, transaction details are open [47]. This transparency makes it easier to audit the system and identify fraud [48]. In supply chain applications, consumers can trace a product's origin, verifying its authenticity [49].

Decentralized technology promotes inclusivity, allowing participation without permission from a central entity [50]. Blockchain allows anyone with the necessary software and hardware to join the network [51]. This democratizes access, fostering innovation for those traditionally excluded from the global economy [52]. A small farmer can bypass intermediaries and connect directly with buyers using blockchain [53].

This model reduces the risk of censorship and manipulation [54]. No single party can unilaterally alter data on the blockchain [55]. If a powerful entity attempts censorship, other nodes would reject the changes [56]. This resistance to censorship makes blockchain valuable for protecting freedom of speech [57].

Decentralized applications (dApps) leverage blockchain to create innovative solutions across various industries, from finance (DeFi) to supply chain management, healthcare, and voting systems [58]. DeFi uses blockchain to create decentralized versions of traditional financial services [59]. dApps represent a tangible manifestation of blockchain's potential, showcasing how its principles can solve real-world problems [60]. As the technology matures, even more impactful dApps are expected to emerge [61].

Behind the Blockchain: Understanding the Technology That Powers Digital Ledgers

While blockchain's initial rise was linked to cryptocurrencies, limiting its perception to digital currencies underestimates its transformative potential [62]. Blockchain's core innovation—a decentralized, immutable, and transparent ledger—unlocks applications across diverse industries, promising increased efficiency, security, and trust [63]. Let's explore use cases beyond cryptocurrency [64].

One promising application is in supply chain management [65]. Blockchain enables tracking goods with accuracy [66]. For example, one can trace a coffee bean's journey from a farmer in Colombia to a coffee shop in New York [67]. Each step is recorded, providing an immutable record [68]. This ensures authenticity, combating counterfeiting, and allows consumers to make informed choices [69]. It also empowers businesses to optimize supply chains and ensure compliance [70]. Pharmaceuticals, luxury goods, and food products all stand to gain [71].

The healthcare industry can be revolutionized by blockchain [72]. The secure storage and sharing of patient data is crucial, and blockchain provides a solution [73]. Instead of fragmented medical records, blockchain allows for a unified, secure, patient-controlled system [74]. A new doctor can securely access a patient's medical history with their consent [75]. This improves interoperability, reduces administrative overhead, and minimizes data breach risks [76]. Blockchain can track pharmaceuticals, ensuring authenticity and preventing counterfeit drugs [77]. The immutability provides an audit trail for procedures, enhancing accountability [78]. Patient privacy is paramount, and blockchain solutions can ensure individuals control data access [79].

Voting systems can be enhanced with blockchain [80]. The integrity of elections is crucial, and blockchain can provide a transparent, auditable voting system [81]. Each vote is recorded as a transaction, creating an immutable record [82]. This allows for independent verification, increasing trust [83]. While challenges remain, pilot projects are exploring blockchain for voting [84]. Transparency could significantly increase voter confidence [85].

Digital identity management can be significantly enhanced [86]. Individuals often have multiple online identities [87]. Blockchain allows consolidating identity information and controlling access [88]. Individuals can create a self-sovereign identity stored on the blockchain [89]. They can prove their identity securely and selectively share information [90]. When applying for a loan, an individual can selectively share their credit history [91]. This enhances privacy and reduces identity theft risk [92].

Intellectual property rights can be protected using blockchain [93]. Creating and registering IP can be cumbersome [94]. Blockchain provides a tamper-proof record of ownership and usage [95]. When a creator registers their work, they establish an immutable timestamp [96]. This can resolve disputes and prevent unauthorized use [97]. Blockchain can manage royalty payments [98]. The immutable nature provides a secure system for managing IP, fostering innovation [99].

Behind the Blockchain: Understanding the Technology That Powers Digital Ledgers

While blockchain offers a revolutionary approach, it's crucial to acknowledge the challenges tempering its adoption [100]. Addressing these hurdles is paramount to unlocking its potential [101].

Scalability remains a primary concern [102]. Many blockchain networks struggle to process transactions at speeds comparable to centralized systems [103]. Each transaction must be verified by a distributed network, taking more time [104]. Imagine an online game running on a blockchain; slow speeds could translate to lag [105]. Layer-2 scaling solutions and alternative consensus mechanisms are being developed, but their effectiveness is under scrutiny [106].

Regulatory uncertainty also casts a shadow [107]. Governments are grappling with how to regulate cryptocurrencies and blockchain applications [108]. The lack of clear regulations creates ambiguity, hindering innovation [109]. The legal status of DeFi platforms remains unclear in many jurisdictions [110]. Inconsistent regulatory approaches can fragment the market [111].

Security vulnerabilities represent another challenge [112]. While blockchain is inherently secure, smart contracts are susceptible to vulnerabilities [113]. The DAO hack in 2016, where hackers stole millions of dollars of Ether, serves as a reminder [114]. Vulnerabilities in the platform can also lead to exploits [115]. Rigorous auditing is essential to maintain user trust [116].

The energy consumption of Proof-of-Work blockchains has raised environmental concerns [117]. PoW requires miners to expend computational power, consuming significant electricity [118]. While the impact is debated, PoW blockchains have a larger carbon footprint than alternatives like Proof-of-Stake [119]. The shift towards energy-efficient mechanisms is crucial for sustainability [120].

Interoperability between different blockchain networks remains a hurdle [121]. Different blockchains operate in silos, making it difficult to exchange data [122]. This lack of interoperability limits cross-chain applications [123]. Transferring assets from Ethereum to Binance Smart Chain requires centralized exchanges [124]. The development of interoperability protocols is essential [125].

The complexity of blockchain technology can be a barrier to entry [126]. Understanding cryptography, consensus mechanisms, and smart contract programming requires specialized knowledge [127]. This complexity can deter developers and make it difficult for users to trust the technology [128]. More user-friendly tools and simplified interfaces are needed [129]. Lowering the barrier to entry is crucial for wider adoption [130].

The Future of Blockchain and Digital Ledgers

The journey of blockchain technology is far from over [131]. The focus is shifting towards addressing limitations and exploring its potential with other advancements [132]. Research is focused on scalability, security, and interoperability [133]. These are the cornerstones of the next generation of blockchain solutions [134].

One pressing concern is scalability [135]. First-generation blockchains suffer from slow transaction speeds [136]. Developers are creating Layer-2 scaling solutions [137]. These solutions process transactions off-chain, summarizing data back to the main blockchain [138]. Layer-2 solutions are like building express lanes [139]. Examples include the Lightning Network for Bitcoin [140]. These solutions improve transaction throughput without fundamental changes [141].

Another focus is energy-efficient consensus mechanisms [142]. Proof-of-Work requires immense computational power [143]. The race is on to create more sustainable algorithms [144]. Proof-of-Stake replaces computational power with token ownership [145]. This reduces the need for energy-intensive mining [146]. Newer mechanisms like Delegated Proof-of-Stake and variations of Byzantine Fault Tolerance are emerging [147]. The goal is to find the optimal balance that allows blockchain networks to remain secure and decentralized while minimizing their environmental impact [148].

The true potential of blockchain will be unlocked through its integration with other technologies, most notably artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) [149]. Imagine a supply chain managed by a blockchain, where AI algorithms analyze data from IoT sensors [150]. The AI could automatically verify conditions, triggering smart contracts to process payments [151]. This creates efficient, transparent, and secure systems [152]. The data integrity provided by the blockchain, coupled with the analytical power of AI and the real-time connectivity of IoT, creates a powerful trifecta [153].

Increased regulatory clarity and standardization are crucial [154]. The current lack of clear frameworks creates uncertainty [155]. As governments develop regulations, it will provide businesses with confidence [156]. Standardization efforts, such as ensuring interoperability, are equally important [157]. Without common standards, it will be difficult for networks to communicate [158]. Standardized protocols will allow for a more interconnected ecosystem [159].

In conclusion, the evolution of decentralized technology, driven by research, integrations, and regulatory developments, promises to transform industries and reshape how we interact with information and value [160]. From streamlining supply chains to revolutionizing financial services, the potential is vast [161]. As scalability improves, energy consumption decreases, and frameworks become clearer, we can expect more widespread adoption [162]. The future of blockchain is not just about digital currencies; it's about creating a more transparent, secure, and efficient world for everyone [163].

References

1. Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2017). The truth about blockchain. Harvard Business Review, 95(1), 118-127.
2. Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O'Reilly Media, Inc.
3. Ermann, D., & Noonan, J. P. (2022). Centralized versus decentralized ledger technology: Implications for audit and assurance. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 19(2), 173-189.
4. Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world. Penguin.
5. Cachin, C., & Vukolić, M. (2017). Blockchain consensus protocols in the wild. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.01873.
6. Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies: a comprehensive introduction. Princeton University Press.
7. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system.
8. Antonopoulos, A. M. (2014). Mastering Bitcoin: unlocking digital cryptocurrencies. O'Reilly Media, Inc.
9. Underwood, S. (2016). Blockchain beyond bitcoin. Communications of the ACM, 59(11), 15-17.
10. Casino, F., Dasaklis, T. K., & Patsakis, C. (2019). A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: current status, classification and open issues. Telematics and Informatics, 36, 84-105.
11. Pilkington, M. (2016). Blockchain technology: principles and applications. In Research handbook on digital transformations. Edward Elgar Publishing.
12. Drescher, D. (2017). Blockchain basics: a non-technical introduction in 25 steps. Apress.
13. Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H. N., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2017). An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. In 2017 IEEE international congress on big data (BigData congress) (pp. 557-564). IEEE.
14. Merkle, R. C. (1988). A digital signature based on a conventional encryption function. In Advances in cryptology—CRYPTO’87 (pp. 369-378). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
15. Wood, G. (2014). Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. Ethereum Project Yellow Paper, 151(2014), 1-32.
16. Atzei, N., Bartoletti, M., & Cimoli, T. (2017). A survey of attacks on Ethereum smart contracts. In International conference on principles of security and trust (pp. 164-186). Springer, Cham.
17. Gervais, A., Ritzdorf, H., Karame, G. O., Wüst, K., Kenigsberg, D., & Capkun, S. (2016). On the security and performance of proof-of-work blockchains. ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security (TOPS), 19(3), 1-35.
18. Crosby, M., Nachiappan, P., Verma, S., & Kalyanaraman, R. (2016). Blockchain technology: Beyond bitcoin. Applied Innovation, 2(6-10), 71.
19. Tian, F. (2016). An agri-food supply chain traceability system for China based on RFID & blockchain technology. In 2016 13th international conference on service systems and service management (ICSSSM) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
20. Hawlitschek, F., Notheisen, B., & Teubner, T. (2018). The limits of trust-free systems: A literature review on blockchain technology and trust in the sharing economy. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 29, 50-63.
21. Beck, R., Czepluch, F. S., Lollike, N., & Malone, S. (2016). Blockchain—the backbone of the internet of things? In Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (pp. 1883-1895).
22. Peters, G. W., & Panayi, E. (2016). Understanding modern banking ledgers through blockchain technologies: Future outlook and challenges. In New solutions for business, technology and science (pp. 239-278). Springer, Cham.
23. Hileman, G., & Rauchs, M. (2017). Global blockchain benchmarking study. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance.
24. Watanabe, H., Fujimura, S., Nakadaira, A., Miyazaki, Y., Akutsu, A., & Kishigami, J. I. (2016). Blockchain as an innovative technology in financial processes. In 2016 8th international conference on innovative computing technology (INTECH) (pp. 247-251). IEEE.
25. De Angelis, S., Aniello, L., Baldoni, R., Coppa, E., & Giannuzzi, F. (2018). Pbft vs. raft in permissioned blockchain: A comparative analysis. In 2018 IEEE international conference on software quality, reliability and security companion (QRS-C) (pp. 377-384). IEEE.
26. Cachin, C. (2016). Architecture of the hyperledger blockchain fabric. In Workshop on distributed cryptocurrencies and consensus ledgers.
27. Mendling, J., Weber, I., Van Der Aalst, W. M., vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M., & Reijers, H. A. (2018). Blockchains for business process management–challenges and opportunities. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 9(1), 1-16.
28. Buterin, V. (2014). A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform.
29. Eyal, I., Gencer, A. E., Sirer, E. G., & Van Renesse, R. (2016). Bitcoin-ng: A scalable blockchain protocol. In 13th USENIX symposium on networked systems design and implementation (NSDI 16) (pp. 45-59).
30. King, S., & Nadal, S. (2012). Ppcoin: Peer-to-peer crypto-currency with proof-of-stake.
31. Li, X., Jiang, P., Chen, T., Luo, X., & Wen, Q. (2017). A survey on the security of blockchain systems. Future Generation Computer Systems, 107, 830-844.
32. Szabo, N. (1997). Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. First Monday, 2(9).
33. Christidis, K., & Vasiliadis, A. (2016). Blockchain applications and use cases: A survey. Linköping University Electronic Press, 1-14.
34. Luu, L., Chu, D. H., Olickel, H., Saxena, P., & Hobor, A. (2016). Making smart contracts smarter. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security (pp. 640-652).
35. Dinh, T. N., Nguyen, T. T., Tran, G., Le, Q., Park, D., & Lee, S. G. (2018). Untangling blockchain: A guide to the state-of-the-art. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 30(7), 1366-1385.
36. Haber, S., & Stornetta, W. S. (1991). How to time-stamp a digital document. Journal of cryptology, 3(2), 99-111.
37. Davidson, S., De Filippi, P., & Potts, J. (2018). Economics of blockchain. Available at SSRN 3175928.
38. Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., & Smolander, K. (2016). Where is current research on blockchain technology?–a systematic review. PloS one, 11(10), e0163417.
39. Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H. N., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2018). Blockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey. International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 14(3), 352-375.
40. Kshetri, N. (2017). Blockchain and sustainable supply chain management in a developing country context. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 55-62.
41. Angraal, S., Rathi, A. K., Dhingra, A., Ahmed, T., Bhattacharya, S., & Sharma, A. (2017). Blockchain technology: possibilities in health care. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 6(2), 195.
42. Ekblaw, A., Azaria, A., Halamka, J. D., & Lippman, A. (2016). A case study for blockchain in healthcare: “MedRec” prototype for electronic health records and medical research data. In Proceedings of IEEE open & big data conference (Vol. 13, p. 738).
43. Moubarak, B., Barker, T., Callahan, C., & Reinhart, W. (2021). Blockchain applications for voting. Computers & Security, 102, 102125.
44. Haq, I., & Anwar, S. (2016). Identity management in cloud using blockchain technology. In 2016 IEEE 10th international conference on semantic computing (ICSC) (pp. 314-317). IEEE.
45. Ramachandran, M., & Mahmood, Z. (2019). Blockchain technology for personal data and identity management. In Cloud computing (pp. 263-281). Springer, Cham.
46. Xu, X., Weber, I., Staples, M., Zhu, L., Bosch, J., Bass, L., ... & Rimba, P. (2017). Architecture for blockchain applications. In International conference on service-oriented computing (pp. 580-596). Springer, Cham.
47. Abeyratne, S. A., & Monfared, R. P. (2016). Blockchain ready manufacturing supply chain using distributed ledger. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 5(09), 1-10.
48. Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Gawankar, S. (2020). Sustainable industry 4.0 practices for enhancing supply chain performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 229, 107835.
49. Kim, H. M., & Laskowski, M. (2018). Towards an ontology-driven blockchain design for supply-chain provenance. Information Systems Frontiers, 20(4), 727-738.
50. Hastig, G. M., Sodhi, M. S. (2020). Blockchain for supply chain traceability: Business requirements and critical design choices. Production and Operations Management, 29(4), 935-954.
51. Roehrs, A., da Costa, C. A., & Righi, R. D. R. (2017). OmniPHR: A distributed and interoperable personal health record system based on blockchain. Journal of biomedical informatics, 71, 70-81.
52. Benchoufi, M., & Ravaud, P. (2017). Blockchain technology for improving clinical research quality. Trials, 18, 1-5.
53. Dubovitskaya, A., Xu, Z., Ryu, S., Schumacher, M., Li, W., & Del Vecchio, D. (2017). Application of blockchain for drug traceability in healthcare supply chain. Applied Sciences, 8(1), 68.
54. Casino, F., Kourtelis, N., Papadaki, M., Zarras, A., & Tsakalidis, A. (2020). Blockchain-based data management for IoT: Review and state-of-the-art. Future Generation Computer Systems, 112, 710-749.
55. Pinna, A., Ibba, S., Baralla, G., & Marchesi, M. (2020). Voting systems based on blockchain technology. In Technologies and applications for blockchain (pp. 325-344). Springer, Cham.
56. Kshetri, N., & Voas, J. (2018). Blockchain as a service. IT Professional, 20(2), 6-9.
57. Alonso, C., Villegas, J. C., Usandizaga, I., Irigaray, T., & Bobillo, F. (2021). A systematic literature review of blockchain-based identity management systems. Computers & Security, 104, 102194.
58. Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: A survey. Computer networks, 54(15), 2787-2805.
59. Huckle, S., Bhattacharya, R., White, M., & Beloff, N. (2016). Internet of things, blockchain and shared economy applications. Applied Innovation, 2(2), 46-61.
60. Lemieux, V. L. (2016). Trusting records: is blockchain technology the answer?. Records Management Journal, 26(2), 110-139.
61. Swan, M. (2017). The science and engineering of blockchain: background, properties, applications.
62. Xu, M., Chen, C., & Kouhizadeh, M. (2019). Lean construction performance management using blockchain technology. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(1), 163-181.
63. Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 247, 108313.
64. Conley, D. (2017). An analysis of the DAO attack. Journal of Internet Law, 20(10), 10-14.
65. Smart Contract Weaknesses. (n.d.). Retrieved from [https://consensys.github.io/smart-contract-best-practices/](https://consensys.github.io/smart-contract-best-practices/)
66. O'Dwyer, K. J., & Malone, D. (2014). Bitcoin mining and its energy footprint. In 22nd European signal processing conference (EUSIPCO) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
67. Hayes, A. S. (2017). Cryptocurrency value formation: an empirical study leading to a cost of production model for valuing bitcoin. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1308-1321.
68. Allison, I. (2015). Consensus-as-a-service: How blockchain start-ups are hoping to profit. International Business Times.
69. Dannen, C. (2017). Introducing Ethereum and solidity. Apress.
70. Buterin, V. (2015). On public and private blockchains.
71. Joseph, J. (2017). Blockchain governance. Harv. JL & Tech Digest, 11, 32.
72. Beck, R., Avital, M., Becek, P., Dennis, C., & Müller, W. (2017). Blockchain technology in business and information systems research. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(6), 381-384.
73. Efanov, D., & Roschin, P. (2018). The all-pervasiveness of the blockchain technology. Procedia Computer Science, 126, 1169-1176.
74. Boonstra, J. P., & da Silva, E. R. (2017). Cultural change and innovation: Towards a conceptual model. European Journal of Innovation Management.
75. Decker, C., & Wattenhofer, R. (2013). Information propagation in the bitcoin network. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on peer-to-peer computing (pp. 1-10).
76. Poon, J., & Dryja, T. (2016). The bitcoin lightning network: Scalable off-chain instant payments.
77. Woo, S. (2017). Is proof-of-stake more energy efficient than proof-of-work?.
78. Baliga, A., Fonseca, P., Golle, P., & Greenleaf, G. (2018). Proof-of-stake from scratch.
79. Yuan, Y., & Wang, F. Y. (2016). Towards blockchain-based intelligent transportation systems. In 2016 IEEE 19th international conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC) (pp. 266-271). IEEE.
80. Novo, O. (2018). Blockchain meets IoT: An architecture for distributed access management of IoT. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5(2), 1184-1195.
81. Dorri, A., Kanhere, S. S., Jurdak, R., & Gauravaram, P. (2017). Blockchain in internet of things: Challenges and solutions.